54 tools do this job

Person enrichment API: a full profile from an email or LinkedIn URL

Give your agent an email address or a LinkedIn URL and get back the person: current title, employer, seniority, location, work history. 54 tools do this through 鹦鹉AI, and they are not close on price. The same match costs 0 credits/success at one and about eighty times that at another, so what you are really choosing is how much a miss costs you.

Billed per call, for what you use. No card required.

36 of the 54 tools that answer this job are live-verified against their upstream.

Try it

What is the best way to ask 鹦鹉AI?

1 · Set your agent up, once

in your agent's chat
set up 鹦鹉AI — https://parrot.amorist.cn/llms.txt

2 · Then ask for the job

the prompt
Using 鹦鹉AI, enrich these 20 LinkedIn URLs into a table: name, current title, company, seniority, location. Show me the price first, and skip anyone whose profile does not resolve.

Why this prompt works

Lead with your strongest key

Email beats LinkedIn URL beats name plus company. Give the best one you have.

Ask for the fields, get a table

Say which columns you want and the agent shapes the response.

Ask what a miss costs

Several tools bill nothing when the person does not resolve.

Re-run the doubtful rows

A second tool on the same person is one more call, not a second contract.

Why 鹦鹉AI

Why go through 鹦鹉AI

No subscription, no seats

Charged per call. No card, no minimum; top up the prepaid balance.

Switch by changing a word

Another tool is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.

From the field

What people actually struggle with

Enrichment is bought on accuracy claims and judged on what happens six weeks later. From ~180 Reddit and X posts in August 2026, with two large astroturf rings excluded, these are the complaints that recur.

The record is right when you buy it and wrong when you use it

“within weeks everything starts falling apart, emails bounce, titles are wrong, half the people moved companies”

r/SalesOperations, 17 points

What this page can do about it:Nothing here stops decay. What per-call pricing changes is that re-checking a doubtful row costs under one credit instead of another annual contract, so you can enrich close to the moment you act instead of once a quarter.

Verified does not mean deliverable

“data accuracy is all over the place. we're seeing high bounce rates even with their “verified” emails”

r/CRM

What this page can do about it:This page prints no tool's accuracy claim, because none of them are measured the same way. Treat enrichment and verification as two steps: enrich, then run the address through a verifier before you send.

You pay for the blanks

“You pay for the data you ASK for, and a big chunk comes back empty or already dead.”

r/b2b_sales

What this page can do about it:Worth checking per tool, because they differ in whether a miss is billed.

Nobody can check an accuracy claim before signing

“Every tool claims it resolves almost every domain. That spread is not a buying signal.”

r/gtmengineering

What this page can do about it:Agreed, which is why the honest test is your own list. Running 200 of your real contacts through three tools costs a few hundred credits here and answers the question for your data rather than someone's benchmark.

The detail

What actually differs

The price spread is the story: the same job runs from under one credit to about 33 credits a record.

The dear end buys either phone numbers (Lusha's direct dials) or breadth of coverage (People Data Labs), not better titles. Decide which you are paying for.

Several tools offer a bulk route at a different rate: Ocean.

io's bulk lookup is half the price of its single enrichment and answers synchronously, while its batch enrichment is asynchronous and returns to a webhook. For fewer than a thousand people the cheap synchronous route is usually the right one.

Background

What is a person enrichment API?

It takes one identifier you already have, usually a work email or a LinkedIn profile URL, and returns the structured record behind it: name, current job title, employer, seniority, department, location and often the full work history. It is the step between knowing someone exists and knowing whether they are worth contacting.

Questions

Before you start

What can I use as input?

A work email or a LinkedIn profile URL works everywhere. Some tools also take a name plus a company domain, and People Data Labs will accept a name with a location. Ask the agent which input a given tool takes.

Do I pay when the person is not found?

It depends on the tool, and it is the most useful thing to check. Some tools charge only when a complete record comes back; others bill the attempt.

Why is one tool eighty times the price of another?

The expensive end sells either phone numbers or coverage breadth. If you do not need direct dials, the cheap end returns the same title and employer.

Is enrichment the same as finding an email?

No. Enrichment starts from an identifier you already have and fills in the profile; finding an email starts from a name and a company and resolves the address. They are separate jobs and separate prices.

Related

Other jobs your agent can do

Markdown version of this page