33 tools do this job

LinkedIn email finder and email finder API: work email from a name or URL

LinkedIn email finder: give your agent a name and company domain, or a LinkedIn URL, and get back a verified work address. 33 tools do this job. Pay per result, not per seat. Every one of them is callable through 鹦鹉AI, at its own rate.

Billed per call, for what you use. No card required.

27 of the 33 tools that answer this job are live-verified against their upstream.

Try it

What is the best way to ask 鹦鹉AI?

1 · Set your agent up, once

in your agent's chat
set up 鹦鹉AI — https://parrot.amorist.cn/llms.txt

2 · Then ask for the job

the prompt
Using 鹦鹉AI, find the work email of the VP of Marketing at stripe.com. Show me the price first, then call the cheapest verified tool and tell me the confidence.

Why this prompt works

Give it what you have

Name plus company domain works everywhere. A LinkedIn URL works with 3 of the 9.

Ask for the price first

鹦鹉AI returns the cost before the call, so ChatGPT can say what it will spend.

Name your preference, the agent picks

“cheapest” · “most reliable” · “only bill me when you find one” · “takes a LinkedIn URL”.

Say what to do on a miss

“If the first returns nothing, try the next cheapest.” That is a waterfall in one line.

Why 鹦鹉AI

Why go through 鹦鹉AI

No subscription, no seats

Charged per call. No card, no minimum; top up the prepaid balance.

Switch by changing a word

Another tool is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.

From the field

What people actually struggle with

The hard part is not finding an address, it is finding one that will not bounce. From 180 posts on Reddit and X in August 2026, these five come up more than anything else.

A bounce hurts the sending domain, not just the campaign

“A bad bounce rate from Apollo can torch your sending domain and trigger weeks of warmup.”

@dan__rosenthal on X

What this page can do about it:Verify before you send. The verification job is one more call at 1.33 credits and returns deliverability plus the mail provider, so you can drop the risky rows instead of gambling the domain.

Find rate and validity are different numbers, and marketing quotes the first

“low coverage means most of the list never even gets contacted. high bounces hurt deliverability.”

r/GrowthHacking

What this page can do about it:This page does not reprint anyone's accuracy claim. It shows the price and what the tool bills for a miss.

Nobody trusts one tool, so everyone builds a waterfall

“Most agencies use one email finder and lose much of their list before even emailing.”

@itsalexvacca on X

What this page can do about it:All nine are callable from the same catalog, so a miss costs one more call to try the next one. Tell the agent the order you want; 鹦鹉AI compares, it does not fail over on its own.

The lead is a LinkedIn URL and nothing else

“I tried GetProspect and Apollo.io to extract the email address but most of them were wrong.”

r/businessemail

What this page can do about it:Three tools here take a LinkedIn URL directly (Tomba, Fiber AI, LeadMagic) and skip name matching entirely. They do not all accept the same input, so ask the agent which one takes what you have.

Coverage claims are indistinguishable, especially outside the US

“everyone's marketing site claims continental coverage so i can't tell which one holds at the smaller-domain end”

r/SalesOperations

What this page can do about it:Nobody can answer this honestly. Per-call pricing makes the real test cheap: run 100 of your own contacts through three tools for a few hundred credits and keep the one that holds up.

The detail

What actually differs

On lists with many misses, whether a tool bills the attempt or only a found address dominates the bill.

Inputs differ: most take name + company domain.

Tomba and Fiber AI also resolve from a LinkedIn URL, and CompanyEnrich needs its own person id from a prior search, so that one is a two-step flow.

Confidence scores are not comparable across tools.

Treat a 'verified' grade from one and a 95 from another as different scales, and verify before you send (see the email verification job).

Background

What is this?

An email finder API takes a person's name and their company's domain (or a LinkedIn URL) and returns the work email address, usually with a confidence score and the sources it was seen on. Tools differ in coverage, in what they accept as input, and in whether they bill per attempt or only per address found.

Questions

Before you start

How much does it cost to find a work email?

Between under one credit and a few credits per found address, depending on the tool. Each call is billed at the tool's own rate. Most tools here charge only on success, so a miss costs nothing.

Which tool should I use?

It depends on what you have. Name plus domain: start with the cheapest verified per-success tool. A LinkedIn URL: use one that accepts it directly. 鹦鹉AI gives you each tool's rate but does not choose or fail over for you.

Is the data legal to use?

These tools return business contact data under their own terms; you are responsible for how you use it, including consent and anti-spam law in your jurisdiction. 鹦鹉AI relays the tool's answer and stores no copy.

Related

Other jobs your agent can do

Run the full sequence

Workflows that use this job

Markdown version of this page