返回行业内容

Simon Willison 呼吁按量付费服务默认设硬预算上限

We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything

评分 54

导读

Simon Willison 认为按量付费服务与 API 应默认设置硬预算上限,即超过每月 X 美元后直接切断并返回错误,而不是仅发警告邮件。他指出编码智能体和个人智能体降低了部署付费服务的门槛,可能在一夜之间产生数百甚至数千美元的意外账单,并提到 AWS 在 9 月 16 日推出每月支出上限、超限暂停项目的功能,Google Cloud 也在 7 月推出 Spend Caps。

推荐理由

作者结合 AWS 与 Google Cloud 的最新额度功能,讨论按量付费服务为何应默认设置硬预算上限,可帮助读者判断智能体时代的成本风险。

主体与标签

AWSGoogle Cloud#现象/趋势#Agent#部署/工程#行业动态

正文

Here’s a product feature which the world is going to need a whole lot more of over the coming months and years: default hard budget caps . I’m talking about the feature of pay-by-usage services and APIs that lets you say “after $X/month, cut this thing off and return errors”. These need to be hard limits. Soft caps, “after $X/month, send me a warning email”, will not cut it.

Coding agents, and personal agents (coding agents wrapped in a less threatening UI), greatly reduce the friction of spinning up code that can do useful things. Sometimes those things cost money—calls to paid APIs, or hosted web applications, or systems that can bill for additional storage and compute.

Nobody wants to wake up to an email sent at midnight warning about a budget limit and find that, while they slept, their rogue service had consumed several hundred (or several thousand) more dollars of usage.

An argument against this is that businesses don’t want their hosted applications to start throwing errors because some budget was exceeded. I expect that most businesses and individuals would prefer errors to a surprise $10,000+ bill.

I think hard budget caps need to be the default. If someone wants to live dangerously they should be able to do that, but it needs to be on an opt-in basis. Have a nice, clear checkbox somewhere prominent:

Remove the budget cap. My application will not be shut down if I exceed the configured budget limit, and I will be responsible for subsequent charges.

The service I most want to see this from is AWS. I’ve heard plenty of stories from people who refuse to use AWS for personal projects out of (justified) fear that a runaway service might bankrupt them. I’ve also heard stories from people who didn’t anticipate this and ended up seriously burned.

... and it turns out AWS finally launched spending limits a few weeks ago! From their announcement New AWS experience helps builders get started and ship faster on 16th September:

When you’re ready to upgrade to a paid plan, you can set a monthly spend limit for your project based on your usage patterns so that you stay within your budget. If a project’s usage reaches its spend limit, your project is paused for that month.

See also Create a spend limit in AWS Settings , though that page warns that “We’re currently releasing our new experience to a limited number of customers.” Here’s hoping that hits general availability for existing accounts soon.

Google Cloud launched a similar feature in July, called Spend Caps, which lets you “set a monthly financial cap on specific services within a project”. Looks like this is becoming a trend!

In an ideal world, our agents could help with this. It would be great if agents started biasing towards recommending providers with hard budget caps, and warning new and inexperienced builders against deploying applications using uncapped services that might get them into trouble.

打开原文 ↗